Hands Off Hartlebury Common

#415: Mike Pexton - Hartlebury Common.

#415 cattle browse aswell as graze, but to the best of knowledge heather and bracken are not on the menu, you are right though this agenda is to line others pockets

tony barnett

Would I be right in thinking you are not open to diverse discussions regarding The Common, and hence the reason you are removing posts? Do you remove posts like you remove the fencing, because it's something you don't agree with, Hide it? Does this also account for your aggresive behaviour towards regular walkers on the common, when they refuse to sign your petition. Yon u droan on and on about the cost of "the management" of Hartlebury Common to the tax payer, but you continue with vandalism to try and make a point! I wonder who pays for thr repair costs of this mindless vandalism, mmmmm let me think, would it be me and every other working person paying their taxes? Give it a rest now, your becoming a nuisance and not doing the common any favours! I have spoken to several people who are terrified about walking their dogs just in case they bump into you Steve, I see this as threatining behaviour and it should not be tolerated by anyone. I for one am glad of the fence, it's a little protection for our dogs and since it has been there I have not seen the regular quad bikers that I used to see every evening, bombing up and down the sand dunes. Surely a. Quad bike will do more damage than a cow, don't you think?

I do not know what has happened to the "Other" site but it seems as if is imploding like its predecessor. On this site, we do not quote the information provided by the so called management, or quote other fixed agenda biased observations. We are the wikileaks of nature conservation. The truth may be unpalatable and hard to swallow but our agenda is the same, the truth against overwhelming odds.

#1395: Steve McCarron - TRUTH

rubbish your entire operation is fixed agenda bias you just qoute from the other side an take no notice of those that sit in the middle and tell each group they are wrong.

Also i think wikileaks would be ashamed if you were associated even by name or idea to them. At least they produce the evidence to back their claims up

#1396: - Re: TRUTH

So can I, how much evidence do you want?

We have our own whistle blowers too.

Its exceptionally important that we protect this area of natural heritage and beauty and I hope the strong depth of feeling continues so that Worcester Council is unsuccesful in its bid to destroy the common with cattle and their attempt to claim ownership due to fencing the common in; so that in years to come they can claim ownership & build on it!!

The council already owned it anyway and fencing it wont give anyone ownership anyway if they didnt own it. Its not worth anything for building and they wouldn't get planning for houses because its a common. Give it back to the travellers families who used to live there they should have it. That would stop everyone arguing weather it should be looked after or not.

So Steve got confused when deleting posts on this page and the supposed hands on page. This is Steves proper page hes the author and hes deleting stuff but calling himself a wanker. Idiot.